While hallucinations of large language models could been alleviated through retrieval-augmented generation and citation generation, how the model utilizes internal knowledge is still opaque, and the trustworthiness of its generated answers remains questionable. In this work, we introduce Context-Prior Augmented Citation Generation task, requiring models to generate citations considering both external and internal knowledge while providing trustworthy references, with 5 evaluation metrics focusing on 3 aspects: answer helpfulness, citation faithfulness, and trustworthiness. We introduce RAEL, the paradigm for our task, and also design INTRALIGN, an integrated method containing customary data generation and an alignment algorithm. Our experimental results show that our method achieves a better cross-scenario performance with regard to other baselines. Our extended experiments further reveal that retrieval quality, question types, and model knowledge have considerable influence on the trustworthiness in citation generation.

Denise Garcia knows that her students sometimes cheat, but the situation she unearthed in February seemed different. A math teacher in West Hartford, Connecticut, Garcia had accidentally included an advanced equation in a problem set for her AP Calculus class. Yet somehow a handful of students in the 15-person class solved it correctly. Those students had also shown their work, defeating the traditional litmus test for sussing out cheating in STEM classrooms. Garcia was perplexed, until she remembered a conversation from a few years earlier.

Denise Garcia knows that her students sometimes cheat, but the situation she unearthed in February seemed different. A math teacher in West Hartford, Connecticut, Garcia had accidentally included an advanced equation in a problem set for her AP Calculus class. Yet somehow a handful of students in the 15-person class solved it correctly. Those students had also shown their work, defeating the traditional litmus test for sussing out cheating in STEM classrooms. Garcia was perplexed, until she remembered a conversation from a few years earlier.

We have implemented a simulation of a robot functioning in the domain of eldercare whose behavior is completely determined by an ethical principle. Using a subset of the perceptions and duties that will be required of such a robot, this simulation demonstrates selection of ethically preferable actions in real time using a case-supported principle-based paradigm. We believe that this work could serve as the basis for ensuring that the behavior of all eldercare robots that are created in the future will be ethically justifiable. Further, we believe that the methods used in this project can be employed in other domains as well, to ensure that the robots that humans interact with in these domains will behave ethically.

Having discovered a decision principle for a well-known prima facie duty theory in biomedical ethics to resolve particular cases of a common type of ethical dilemma, we developed three applications: a medical ethics advisor system, a medication reminder system and an instantiation of this system in a Nao robot. We are now developing a general, automated method for generating from scratch the ethics needed for a machine to function in a particular domain, without making the assumptions used in our prototype systems.

In this paper, we examine Robot Defense, a computer game that serves as a pedagogical platform for students to explore methods typically covered in an Introductory Artificial Intelligence course. Robot Defense is the synergistic outcome of two NSF funded Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) projects and was first presented in (Wallace, Russell and Markov 2008). The primary contribution of this paper is to discuss the implementation of the Robot Defense platform and the outcome of its first use in the classroom.

The newly emerging field of machine ethics (Anderson and Anderson 2006) is concerned with adding an ethical dimension to machines. Unlike computer ethics -- which has traditionally focused on ethical issues surrounding humans' use of machines -- machine ethics is concerned with ensuring that the behavior of machines toward human users, and perhaps other machines as well, is ethically acceptable. In this article we discuss the importance of machine ethics, the need for machines that represent ethical principles explicitly, and the challenges facing those working on machine ethics. We also give an example of current research in the field that shows that it is possible, at least in a limited domain, for a machine to abstract an ethical principle from examples of correct ethical judgments and use that principle to guide its own behavior.

NASA Ames Research Center Polish Academy of Sciences URL: www.taai.org.tw/announce/ (PRICAI 2004). (ICKEDS 2004). This book looks at some of the results of the synergy among AI, cognitive science, and education. Examples include virtual students whose misconceptions force students to reflect on their own knowledge, intelligent tutoring systems, and speech recognition technology that helps students learn to read.

Aided Design of User Interfaces. (ICKEDS 2004). "Halpern presents a masterful, complete and unified account of the many ways in which the connections between logic, probability theory and commonsensical linguistic terms can be formalized. 'believed,' 'known,' 'default,' 'relevant,' "Presents a novel thesis--that the mind is a'independent,' and'preferred' are given rigorous program whose components are semantically semantical and syntactical analyses, and their meaningful modules--and explores it with a rich interrelationships explicated and exemplified. An array of evidence drawn from a variety of fields.

(ICKEDS 2004). GECAD--Knowledge Engineering and ICINCO Secretariat Decision Support Research Group Escola Superior de Tecnologia de Setubal Rua Dr. Antonio Bernardino Almeida / Campus do IPS